logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.11.24 2016가단316187
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 16,303,121 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from September 1, 2015 to November 24, 2016.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a) The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition may be found either in dispute between the parties or in the entries or videos of Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1, 2, and 5 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same as the same), together with the overall purport of the pleadings:

At around 03:50 on September 1, 2015, the Plaintiff entered the 2nd restaurant of “E” operated by the Defendant located in Busan Seo-gu, Busan, along with three Dong carcs, and drinked the boom with the booming fishing gear to a chemical installed in the center of the table table. After drinking the breath, the Plaintiff issued an additional order for making the breath, and frighted the booming to the above blag.

However, the Plaintiff directly brought about the portable gas bags stored in the restaurant line, covered the iron plate above the restaurant with the shot shot, and added it to the shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot, but the shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot

B. At around 05:58 on the same day, C suffered from serious injury, such as face, wood, arms, and chest, on the part of the Plaintiff, such as face, 2-3 degrees of image, etc., due to the occurrence of an accident in which the butane gas of the instant gas is explosiond (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. (1) The perpetrator shall be liable to compensate for damages suffered by the tortfeasor, if the tortfeasor's tort was caused by competition between the tortfeasor's act and other causes, not by the tortfeasor's tort, but by the tortfeasor's act and other causes attributable to a third party.

(See Supreme Court Decision 97Da12082 delivered on February 23, 1999). The above is the case.

arrow