Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant has been suspected of having been serving as his wife D and police officers, and E having been serving as his wife D and police officers.
On December 2, 2013, the defendant committed the illegal act of embezzlement and misappropriation in collusion with D in order to have E receive criminal punishment or disciplinary action at the F attorney office located in Jung-Eup/Myeon, for the purpose of having E be subject to criminal punishment or disciplinary action.
Inasmuch as “a written complaint was made” was written.
However, in fact, E did not commit embezzlement or breach of trust in collusion with Defendant’s wife D.
Nevertheless, on December 20, 2013, the defendant submitted a written complaint to the branch office of the Jeonju District Public Prosecutor's Office to the branch office of the Eup/Myeon office of the Jeonju District Public Prosecutor's Office and filed a complaint
2. On July 5, 2016, the Defendant started to commit suicide from the 180 North Korean National Police Agency (Seoul Regional Police Agency) to “E working at the Chang Chang Police Station due to fraud, destruction of home, and violence, etc.” on July 5, 2016.
The Commissioner General of the National Police Agency shall commit suicide after a natural interview.
The applicable law stated in the indictment by openly pointing out false facts and the overall context of the facts charged is clear that the Defendant is false, and as such, this part of the indictment does not interfere with the Defendant’s guarantee of defense by recognizing this part of the facts charged, thereby impairing the victim E’s reputation by ex officio adding the above phrase to criminal facts.
3. On July 6, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (hereinafter “Information and Communications Network Utilization Act”) included three copies of pictures of one’s own form blicket Nos. 102, 804, H apartment 102, Haak-gun, a smartphone, with a view to slandering the victim E, by accessing the victim E, from his own dwelling.