The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

According to the records, the defendant appealed against the judgment of the court of first instance, and asserted only mental health and injury as the grounds for appeal along with unreasonable sentencing.

In such a case, the argument that there is an error of mistake or misunderstanding of legal principles in the judgment below is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

In addition, the argument that the judgment of the court below is erroneous in incomplete deliberation on the sentencing conditions is the argument of unfair sentencing.

However, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the punishment

Meanwhile, Article 259(2) of the Criminal Code cannot be said to be unconstitutional against the principle of equality under the Constitution.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.