A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around August 4, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol leveling of about 0.207% from the 44-lane in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to the 19:35-ro, Dongjak-gu, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, to the 8-ro, Dongjak-gu, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, for the same day, driving Crocketing vehicles under the influence of alcohol leveling of about 40 meters from the 19:35, to the 88-ro, Dongjak-gu, Dongjak-gu, Seoul.

2. On August 4, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at around 20:20, the Defendant was subject to a demand for a drinking alcohol response signal depending on the south of the drinking-free, while reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident on the road located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ebmarket prior to the scene after receiving 112 reports on the circumstances and circumstances leading up to the accident.

The Defendant committed an assault against the police officer, i.e., “N. N. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the drinking control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness’s legal statement;

1. The defendant was physically and mentally disabled when considering his/her behavior, such as a police officer and the attempt to make a mobile phone call;

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 148-2 (2) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of official duties);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The Criminal Act for mitigation of quantity;