The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On June 8, 2014, the summary of the facts charged, at the defendant's house located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, 6.403 Dong 403, the defendant openly insultingd the victim by stating that "the victim D, along with the defendant's mother, found the victim's mother Eul in order to receive the clothes value from F, and she was heard by E and apartment residents, who want to enjoy the first race and the first race, and the neighbors of the apartment."

2. In the judgment criminal procedure, the evidence that there is a criminal fact must be presented by the prosecutor, and the criminal fact should be proven by the judge so that the judge can have high probability to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, and if there is no evidence to establish such a degree of conviction, the suspect is suspected of guilt even in the absence of evidence.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

As evidence to support the facts charged of this case, each legal statement of the victim and E and each investigative agency are recorded.

However, in this court, the victim and E make a statement consistent with the fact that the defendant made the same remarks as the facts charged to the victim within the house after closing the door of the defendant's entrance, but they also make a statement that the defendant's house was found, the circumstances leading up to finding the defendant's house before the defendant's house, and whether the victim's house opened the defendant's house while opening the defendant's house (in particular, the victim made a statement to the effect that the door was open with the person going outside the house and the other people did not appear in the place leading to the defendant's house or in the place leading to the defendant's house, while E has made a statement that the long time and the next house used to resist the other people's disturbance in the place leading to the defendant's house, and even if it can be seen from the evidence submitted by the defendant, the victim and E are also the victim.