The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, at around 09:00 on August 8, 2016, told the victim D (the 52 years old) who was scambling by the Defendant at C, and the scambling of scams, during the dispute, during the dispute, “nick” is the victim;

Nice Doz. Doz.;

Hayman Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz.

The phrase "" was made, and it was time for the victim to do so one time by drinking to listen to the phrase "the right to grow.........."

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. Since the above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, a public prosecution cannot be instituted against the clearly expressed intent of the victim pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

In this regard, since a written application for criminal punishment that the victim D does not want to be punished against the defendant was submitted to this court on August 23, 2017 after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.