logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.06.08 2017고정342
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The owner or user of a private-use truck shall not provide or lease such private-use truck commercially for transport of cargo.

1. From April 1, 2016 to May 31, 2016, Defendant A: (a) received delivery of one ton of the cargo vehicles owned by the Defendant C at the Sin-si, Sin-ri, Sin-ri, Sin-ri, Sin-ri, Sin-ri, Sin-ri, Sin-ri, Sin-ri, from around April 1, 2016 to around May 31, 2016; (b) received delivery of KRW 4,398,270, 270 on April 4, 2016; and (c) provided for cargo transport at a cost.

2. From April 1, 2016 to May 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) delivered to CJ one ton of the cargo vehicles used by D owners of the Defendant at one ton of the cargo vehicles for the trucking transport in Korea; and (b) received delivery of KRW 4,297,817,817, and KRW 4,4,489,801 on May 4, 2016, to supply the cargo for compensation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to E and F;

1. Article 67 Subparag. 7 and Article 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act, applicable to the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 67 Subparag. 7 and 56, applicable to the option of a penalty;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow