The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal withdrawn the allegation of mistake on the first trial date.

The punishment of the court below (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. 판단 피고인은 목사로서 장애인을 보호하여야 할 지위에 있음에도 그 지위를 망각하고 피해자인 장애인들에게 몹쓸 짓을 저질렀다.

The defendant committed the crime of this case on a planned basis by taking advantage of the fact that persons with disabilities are easily aware of their interests and difficulties, and that they are willing to refrain from committing the crime of this case.

The crime of this case committed by the defendant is extremely poor, and the victims have suffered considerable pain due to sexual humiliation.

The defendant committed a sexual indecent act against the victim E under the pretext that he was aware that he was aware of, and the above victim was able to make an appraisal at the time of his experience in the form of a pen.

Despite such evidence, the Defendant has abused the characteristics of sexual crimes committed in secret without witness from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the original trial, and has consistently denied and inconsistent with the attitude that denies the crime.

Not only in the investigation agency but also in the court of the court below, the victims have to appeal to avoid their damage and suppression at the risk of sense of shame before investigation agencies and court officials.

As a result, the victims suffered secondary damage that can only send the time of suffering, such as continuing to leave their memorys wanting to be forgotten.

Of course, even if the defendant committed a crime, he does not have the obligation to confession the crime, and if he denies the crime, he shall also be fully guaranteed the defendant's right to defense against it.

However, it is due to excessive and unreasonable exercise of the right of defense beyond the legitimate exercise of the right of defense given to the defendant.