Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 16, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on the ground that the Defendant’s wife D, who was in his/her possession in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, about 11:40, does not open a door to the Defendant’s wife D, who was in his/her possession, destroyed the locking system, and was under questioning from F, who was dispatched after receiving the report of the foregoing D-12, during the damage of the locking system, the Defendant was under questioning from F, who was in his/her possession, of the background of the instant case, and whether he/she is a superior.

The door "I am", and "I am you see that I am immediately with the snow in the form of the body."

p. L. L. L.C.

The term "I" and the above F is dnished by "I"

"라고 하자 위 F이 착용하고 있던 안경을 오른손으로 벗겨 바닥에 던진 후 발로 밟고, 오른쪽 손바닥으로 위 F의 안면 부를 2회 때리고 발로 위 F의 오른쪽 다리를 1회 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted F and interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of report 112.

2. The Defendant damaged the property by cutting off, at the time, at the time, and at the place, the victim F’s neck, as mentioned above, from the floor, and taking a scambling, the Defendant destroyed the property of the victim by making the victim wear approximately KRW 200,000,00 of the market price of the victim’s property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (related to the submission of a receipt for damage within the boundary of the victim F);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In full view of the factors indicated in the trial process of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, for the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentence is ordered as set forth in the Disposition above.