Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person operating a business entity referred to as “B” that entrusts the agency of a communications company, such as SK Telecom, and C is an employee of the said “B”.

Where a provider of telecommunications services collects and uses personal information of a user and attains the purpose of collection and use, he/she shall destroy such personal information without delay so that it cannot restore and reproduce such information.

Nevertheless, the Defendant and C, at the office of “SK Telecom D” entrusted by the “B” located in the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Goyang-si on January 2017, the Defendant and C intented to keep the documents of application for joining the SK Telecom without destroying the documents of application for joining to the customers of the SK Telecom.

C In accordance with the above mother, from February 1, 2017 to March 31, 2017, at the above agency, a total of 525 documents in the list of crimes IV, such as the name, resident registration number, address, account information, mobile phone number, etc. collected by users in the course of subscribing to the SK Telecom, and the "application for new subscription to the SK Telecom" in which users' personal information such as the user's personal information, such as the name, resident registration number, address, and cell phone number, are recorded, are not destroyed even after the completion of the "user's SK Telecom Subscription" for the purpose of collecting and using the above personal information, and operated by C by May 19,

E They stored in the E So-Sa car.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with C to achieve the purpose of collecting and using personal information, and did not destroy the personal information so that it can not be restored and recovered without delay.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C to the prosecution;

1. Article 73 subparagraph 1-2 of Article 73 and Article 29 (1) 1 of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, including the Defendant’s age, sex, intelligence and environment, and motive for committing the crime.