logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.05.29 2015고합41
변호사법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

F is a real estate development agent company G and a person operating H Co., Ltd., which acts on behalf of Defendant B with approval and permission for factory sites, etc., and Defendant A is a person working for the business from the Gyeonggi Ethical viewing to April 12, 2012.

is a retired person.

1. The Defendants, in collusion with the J (the Suwon District Court, November 1, 2013, sentenced the Attorney-at-Law Act and the crime of fraud, sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment and 47 million won of penalty surcharges) and attempted to obtain permission, etc. for conversion of forest land, such as K forest and forest land in the time of harmony, but did not intend to obtain permission, etc., but did not intend to do so, to receive money and valuables under the pretext of accepting permission, etc. by soliciting or arranging the permission, etc. from the public officials, etc. in charge of emulation and viewing with the view of accepting permission, etc. for conversion of mountainous district.

Accordingly, at the G corporation office located in Suwon-si M on May 21, 2012, the Defendants and J received KRW 47 million in total from F in the G corporation office around July 31, 2012, the sum of KRW 27 million from F, including “F,” “F,” which is located in Suwon-si N, around July 24, 2012, at the G corporation office, was provided to F with the purport to the effect that Defendant A is responsible for the public officials of the upper lines of the video viewing.”

As a result, the Defendants received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting or arranging the affairs handled by the public officials in collusion with the J.

2. On July 24, 2012, Defendant A agreed to have the money received from F divided into J and B, as described in paragraph (1), and received KRW 9 million out of KRW 27 million from J at the “O” coffee shop, and received KRW 16 million in total from J, around July 31, 2012.

On September 27, 2013, the Defendant violated the Attorney-at-Law Act (Law No. 503) against J in Suwon-si District Court No. 310 located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

arrow