1. As to KRW 204,185,918 and KRW 188,130,408 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant up to October 24, 2013.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a manufacturing company of lighting organization parts located in the People's Republic of China, and the defendant operates a mutual lighting organization's wholesale and retail business.

B. On July 22, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) supplied the Defendant with an external ionion amounting to USD 52,846.70; (b) an external ion amounting to USD 63,810.60 on October 15, 201; (c) an external ion amounting to USD 57,540.0 on November 5, 201; and (d) an external ion amounting to USD 6,054.04 on December 21, 201, respectively.

(hereinafter referred to as “goods(i) or (iv) by the sequence,” and “each of the goods of this case” in total referred to as “each of the goods of this case”). 【No dispute exists, entry in Gap’s 3, 4, 5, and 6 (including each number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1 of the parties sought payment of KRW 195,269,920 which is a sum of USD 180,251.34 in accordance with the defendant's order, and only USD 8,646.48 out of the price of the goods was paid by the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion 1 of the parties sought payment of KRW 195,269,920 which is a sum of USD 180,251 in Korean Won. Even if the contract for the supply of each of the goods of this case was not concluded between the defendant for the return of unjust enrichment, the defendant sought payment of KRW 195,269,920 which is a sum equivalent to the value of each of the goods of this case supplied by the plaintiff, KRW 195,269,920 in Korean Won, KRW 50 in Korean Won and KRW 195,50 in Korean Won, KRW 1650 in Korean Won and KRW 450 in Korean Civil Litigation, KRW 165156,96165 won in Korean Civil Procedure.