1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A KRW 36,957,625.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows. Thus, the reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where each corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article

The Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant tourer”) in Part 3 8 is deemed to be “Defendant D Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. of the first instance trial (hereinafter “instant tourer”)”, and the Defendant tourer in not more than 10 each “Defendant tourer” is deemed to be “instant tourer.”

The defendant insurance company of not more than 3 pages 10 each "the defendant insurance company" shall be dismissed as "the defendant".

Part of "A. lost earnings" shall be written in accordance with the following statement: 5 to 10 pages 4:

A person shall be appointed.

A. 1) Facts of recognition and content of assessment) Gender and date of birth: Females and Muss (36 years and 7 months and 4 years of age at the time of an accident): The maximum working age: Until February 28, 2043 (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2018Da248909, Feb. 21, 2019), the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff would not claim the maximum working age of 2,284,68 won from January 201 to September 2014, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion that the maximum working age of 2,288 won should not be applied from October 5, 2014 to August 28, 2017, based on the average monthly wage of 200,000 won from August 28, 2014 to August 26, 2017.