logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.09.05 2019고단1899
공용물건손상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 26, 2019, the Defendant damaged public goods by opening approximately 2 meters of the Garail-gu B building Cdong-gu, Youngdong-si on the front of the building, and without any particular reason, at least 600,000 won in total, of the repair cost, by means of opening off the Gara-gu, which is a public goods owned by the Gana-gu Office, which are installed on the road, without any specific reason.

2. The Defendant, at the date and time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1) of the obstruction of performance of official duties, “any male sponse a safety bar between India and the roadway” was arrested in flagrant offenders from D and the same slope E, etc., under the 112 report and called out, from the situation belonging to the Gangseo-dong Police Station, the same slope E, etc., sent out, and took a bath, and when the Defendant was faced with D while carrying the patrol glass door by using head, drinking, etc., he was forced to remove the face of the victim, and the face of the victim’s face was displayed on the right arms, and the body parts of the E, which restrain it, were divided into several face parts of the victim’s face.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Investigation reports (in relation to the verification of CCTV images at the site), investigation reports (in relation to the submission of estimates to install fences damaged by public goods), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (in relation to the verification of CCTV images at the parking and stopping);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. For the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, each of the crimes of this case is destroyed by the defendant, without any reason, on the road.

arrow