1. Defendant E’s KRW 5,811,00 and its annual amount from May 30, 201 to December 11, 2014, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff asserts as follows. A. The plaintiff asserts as the ground for the claim of this case.

성명불상자가 2014. 5. 30. 15:34∽17:30경 인천 계양구 H아파트 106동 1203호에서 원고에게 서울중앙지검 금융범죄수사팀이라고 전화하여 개인명의도용 등 사건해결을 위해 검찰청 가짜사이트에 접속하도록 유도하여 원고가 마치 사건에 관계되어 있는 것처럼 속여 이를 믿은 원고로 하여금 성명불상자의 안내에 따라 자신의 농협계좌와 하나은행계좌의 보안카드와 OTP생성번호 등을 알려주도록 하여 같은 날 하나대투증권 피고 B의 계좌, 대신증권 피고 C의 계좌, 우체국 피고 D의 계좌, 삼성증권 피고 E의 계좌, 상호신용금고 피고 F의 계좌, 현대증권 피고 G의 계좌 등으로 합계 34,329,850원(= 피고 B 9,993,850원 피고 C 5,915,000원 피고 D 5,956,000원 피고 E 5,811,000원 피고 F 5,831,000원 피고 G 823,000원)을 이체하여 편취하였다.

B. The Defendants: (a) by negligently managing his account by fault; and (b) by allowing the unsatisf of his name to use it as a tool for committing a new financial fraud (so-called “Satphishing”); and (c) aiding and abetting the commission of fraud of the unsatf

C. Therefore, pursuant to Article 760(3) of the Civil Act, the Defendants are obligated to pay to the Plaintiff money transferred to the account in the name of the Defendants as damages and damages incurred therefrom.

2. Determination on the claim against Defendant E

A. As to the Plaintiff’s assertion as above, Defendant E shall be deemed to have led to the confession under Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. Therefore, from May 30, 201, which is the date of the instant tort, Defendant E’s damage compensation amounting to 5,811,000 won to the Plaintiff, 5% per annum as stipulated by the Civil Act from May 30, 2014 to December 11, 2014, and 20% per annum as stipulated by the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment.