1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, Defendant B, C, and D: (a) KRW 1,202,820, respectively, to the Plaintiff; and (b) from March 7, 2013.

1. Basic facts

A. (i) On February 22, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Korea Water Resources Corporation for the feasibility study of nutrition multi-purpose dams (hereinafter “instant service”) and subcontracted part of the instant service to the Korea Water Resources Corporation and the Korea Water Resources Corporation for the Canan River Technology Corporation (hereinafter “Canan River”), and is engaging in the instant service along with the Saman River.

Shebly Defendants are residents who have resided in the waterside of the nutrition group, which is planned to be a nutrition dam, and have opposed to the construction of a nutrition dam.

B. (1) On February 28, 2013, the Defendants’ act of interference with the instant service was entrusted with the part of the compensation investigation for the instant service with other investigation teams, and the Plaintiff attempted to enter the vegetable-gun river bridge, which is the entrance of the investigation site around 9:00 a.m. on February 26, 2013 in order to conduct an on-site investigation. However, around that time, the Defendants, in combination with other residents opposing the construction of a nutrition dam, attempted to enter the vegetable-gun river bridge, which is the entrance of the investigation site, thereby threatening the investigation personnel and equipment to cause harm or damage to the investigation personnel and equipment, and interfere with the Plaintiff’s entry into the investigation site by means of spreading the survey personnel and equipment out of the transmitting bridge, and bringing the bonus and freight to the front road of the transmitting bridge.

C. From March 5, 2014 to March 7, 2014, the Defendants continued to obstruct the entry of the research personnel input by the Plaintiff by the following methods: (i) the Defendants, along with other residents, engaged in the investigation on March 5, 2014 and March 6, 2014; (ii) the persons involved in the investigation on this frame, together with other residents, brought a bonus on the roads front of the transmitting bridge; and (iii) the Defendants continued to interfere with the entry of the research personnel input by the Plaintiff.

Sheet Defendant A, along with other residents on March 7, 2014, obstructed entry of investigation equipment and persons related to the investigation by the method of preventing investigation equipment from being creamed and the method of avoiding the cream in the side. D.

The Daegu District Prosecutors' Office in the criminal case against the Defendants.