The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, due to the summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The judgment of the court below is highly poor in light of the following: the defendant led to confession of the crime of this case and reflects his depth; the benefits acquired by the defendant from the crime of this case are relatively minor and appears to have been involved in the crime of this case by the solicitation of the accomplice B; the victim and the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim; however, the crime of this case is committed in collusion with B, etc. by using the location tracking Handphones which was hidden inside the vehicle in advance after the defendant sold the vehicle to the victim; the crime of this case was stolen by using the location tracking Handphones which was hidden inside the vehicle; the crime of this case is intelligent and planned; the defendant committed the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dok-on Vehicle) at Sungnam branch of the Suwon District Court on September 15, 2006; the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months on July 27, 2007; the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for rape in Seoul High Court on July 27, 2007.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.