logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.04.20 2017고정6
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in a car in a car in a car in a car.

On August 19, 2016, the Defendant driven the above micking Vehicle around 01:25 on August 19, 2016, and led to two lanes in front of the E, which are located in D, at the right speed, to the wallsan apartment from the side of the hospital, at a sloping speed.

The location is a bend road and at night at the time. In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care.

Nevertheless, the defendant's negligence of driving in the front direction while neglecting the front direction, which is installed on the right side of the running direction of the defendant, was shocked by the following: (a) the guard day of the net city management, which is installed on the right side of the running direction of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not immediately stop and take necessary measures while destroying KRW 1,590,000 for restoration expenses to the KRW 1,59,000 for the restoration expenses to the KRW 1,59,00 for occupational negligence above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Evidence and photographs of the traffic accident scene;

1. Report of investigation (specific suspect);

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 148 of the relevant Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) shall be determined as the same in light of the fact that there was no criminal history during the last twenty years, and the circumstances in which efforts were made to recover damage, such as bearing repair expenses for the diversday, etc.

arrow