1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: ① “FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFY 31, 2016; ② “Defendant B, C, D, and E” in Chapter 8 is as “Defendant B, E, Co-Defendant C, C, and D”; and ③ the foregoing part of the judgment is deleted from the main sentence of Article 201 of the Civil Procedure Act, with the exception of the foregoing part as stated in the judgment.

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. First, the Plaintiff asserts that, after the bankrupt bank was declared bankrupt, the resolution of deferment of the maturity of the Council of this case passed on December 23, 2014 was a new modification contract between the non-party company and the creditor financial council, and thus, the Plaintiff, the bankruptcy trustee in the status of a third party is not effective, and the Defendant did not express its intent to make profits therefrom.

However, the former Corporate Restructuring Promotion Act was established to adjust claims and impose new obligations on creditor financial institutions through autonomous agreements between the creditor financial institutions, based on the realistic consideration that there is a limit to the extent to which the majority of the creditor financial institutions are forced to incorporate into the joint administrative proceeding. Accordingly, according to such legislative purpose, all the financial institutions which granted credit to an enterprise showing signs of insolvency are defined as "creditor financial institutions", and all the creditor financial institutions, in principle, other than the creditor financial institutions with small claims whose exclusion has been decided, shall be members of the Council