logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.03.19 2015고합26
특수강도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

A seized kitchen (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Special robbery;

A. On January 22, 2015, around 05:00 on January 22, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime at C convenience store: (a) at C convenience store located in Kimhae-si, the victim E (in women, 25 years old) confirmed that he worked alone at the above convenience store; and (b) entered the said convenience store.

Then, the Defendant, who is a deadly weapon prepared in advance, seems to have shown that the kitchen blade (18cc in a blade, No. 1 in a knife length) was put above the calculation unit and did not respond to the demand. The Defendant, who did not resist the money in a safe by stating that “in a case where the money in a safe is considered as a tax base of a tax base of a tax base,” and took 50,000 won in cash from a food victim in a simple safe for sale.

B. On January 22, 2015, around 05:17, the Defendant committed the crime at F convenience stores, at F convenience stores located in G Kimhae-si, the victim H (19 years of age) confirmed that he worked alone at the above convenience store and entered the said convenience store.

Then, the Defendant, who was prepared in advance, had a kitchen knife with the kitchen knife in the kitchen knife, threatened the victim, and prevented the victim from resisting the money in the safe, called “insent tax base”, and took the cash amount of 750,000 won in a simplified safe for sale from the victim of flue, who was flue, to the contrary.

2. On January 22, 2015, the Defendant attempted special robbery, at around 05:14, carried with him the kitchen gate specified in the first paragraph, which was prepared in advance, in order to forcibly take money and goods at the convenience store operated by the victim J (the age of 46) of Kimhae-si, and intruded with the kitchen gate. However, the above convenience store has served as a man who has a large number of stuffs, and thus, the Defendant was absent from the above convenience store and attempted to commit robbery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to the victim H and J;

1. A written statement of victim E;

1. Request for the confirmation of the site site correspondence;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 334(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

arrow