logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.12.10 2018가단267640
자동차소유권이전등록절차인수 등
Text

1. On December 31, 2016, the Defendant concluded an entrustment management contract with the Plaintiff on the motor vehicles stated in attached Form 1 from the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 27, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract by acquiring the right to permit trucking transport business from C Co., Ltd. (former trade name: D Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “C”) for KRW 240 million.

(hereinafter “this case’s acquisition contract”). (b)

The main contents of the acquisition contract of this case are as follows, and attached Table 2 of Article 5 (2) of the above acquisition contract are as shown in attached Table 2.

Article 1 (Subject Matter of Transfer) C shall be the following objects to be transferred to the Plaintiff by C:

1) A truck license number (T/O) for business use owned by C: Attachment 3) Annexed 2 of Article 5 (Special Matters) of the Statement of the unpaid Revenue Rates for Designated Vehicles attached to the Certificate of Automobile Registration (T/O) attached to C, the borrower and the manager of the vehicle must consent without any objection at any time at the time when the request for the relocation of the vehicle and the transfer of individual cargo is made by E. A.

In addition, vehicle rent is exempted, and other public charges and taxes are claimed.

C. On December 2014, the Plaintiff entered into an entrustment management contract with the Defendant for the first 25 tons of early cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat c

The defendant is running the freight truck of this case and running the trucking transport business until now.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3, 6, 7, Eul evidence No. 1 (including additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Assertion and determination

A. Although the Plaintiff’s assertion was invalidated due to the termination of the contract of this case, the Defendant is running the instant cargo vehicle without entering into a new entrustment management contract with the Plaintiff or paying the entrusted management expenses.

The instant contract was terminated on December 31, 2016 as the expiration of the period.

arrow