Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 6, 200, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and two years of suspension of execution for the purpose of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. at the credit branch of Suwon District Court on December 6, 200, and was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury in the same support on April 1, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence at the port prison on September 29, 2013.

1. Around 04:30 on December 31, 2014, the Defendant, at the 2nd entrance of the victim D (the 58-year-old)’s “EMel” operated in Snju City, the Defendant was unable to flick the victim with a large sound of 35,000 won for the reason that she was under the influence of alcohol, but she was willing to go to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the her to the

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's mother business by force.

2. At around 04:45 on December 31, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim G (the age of 36) who was a police official from the police officer belonging to the Nanju Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving the said D’s report at the above conference; (b) expressed the victim G (the age of 36) who was a police official after receiving the said request that “I am locked because other people get locked,” and continuously threatened the victim with the victim’s flabing of the flab, and threatening the victim’s flabing of the victim’s flab.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties on crime prevention and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement related to G and H;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the same as the obstruction of performance of official duties.