logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.24 2012가단227816
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The defendant,

A. The phrase “the past rent after surveying and appraisal” in the No. 1 table in the attached Table 1 list to the Plaintiff A is described respectively.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs have owned each of the relevant lands listed in the “location, parcel number” column in the attached list No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”) during the pertinent period indicated in the “use period” column in the above list, and the Defendant has established and used transmission towers and transmission lines (the voltage 345kV) on the instant land from the first day of the pertinent period to the present day.

B. From around 1985, the Defendant, as indicated in the separate sheet No. 2, “land” as indicated in the above list as “land” (hereinafter “land subject to superficies”). The remainder of the land in this case is “land excluded from superficies” as indicated in the separate sheet No. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 15, and 16, respectively, is the land subject to superficies creation, and each of the pertinent land listed in the separate sheet No. 1, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 17 is the land excluded from superficies. Ultimately, the Plaintiff’s land excluded from superficies No. 1 among the land excluded from superficies No. 2, 3, and 4 of this case, and the land excluded from superficies No. 1, 5 of this case, and 17 of this case’s land excluded from superficies No. 5 of this case’s land among the land excluded from superficies No. 6, 10, 1 of this case’s land excluded from superficies No.

arrow