1. The judgment of the first instance is modified following the reduction of claims in the trial after remand.

(1) The defendant on June 1, 2010.

1. The facts under the disposition of global income tax are found to be clear in the records of this case, and the whole purport of the pleadings is acknowledged by taking account of Gap evidence Nos. 1-1 to 10, Gap evidence No. 2 and 3, Eul evidence No. 1-1 to 10.

[1] On November 1, 2009, the Defendant issued a disposition imposing global income tax for the year 2008 against the Plaintiff on November 1, 2009, but subsequently corrected the increase on June 28, 2010, and corrected the reduction on September 17, 2010.

On May 27, 2010, the Defendant imposed global income tax on the Plaintiff in 199.

On May 27, 2010, the Defendant imposed global income tax on the Plaintiff in 2004, but revised the tax amount on June 28, 2010.

On June 28, 2010, the Defendant imposed global income tax on the Plaintiff in 200, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2007, but subsequently reduced or corrected the imposition disposition of global income tax for the year 2007.

According to the above decision of increase and reduction, the defendant imposed global income tax on the plaintiff on May 27, 2010 for the year 1999, and imposed global income tax on the plaintiff on June 28, 2010 for the year 200 to 2008, and the details thereof are as follows.

Imposition of additional tax: 29,86,623,106 won for the year 1999; 60,487,691,514 won for 90,374,514,620 won for the year 200; 21,167,237,398,562,930 won for the year 2005; 367,368,748,647,67,690 for the year 2005, 207, 207, 205, 207, 367, 367, 297, 205, 207, 205, 207, 365, 207, 367, 294, 205, 205, 207, 367, 3605, 205, 207, 2075

The defendant.