The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant is in the air conditioners in the village hall, and there is no fact that the Defendant did not mixing the agricultural chemicals with the air conditioners, and there is no fact that the victims are mixed with air conditioners.

The evidence produced by the prosecutor alone proves that the facts charged were proven without reasonable doubt.

Although the court below found the defendant guilty, it erred by misunderstanding the facts.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the judgment of the court below in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, whether the defendant's name was and the victim's direct damage to the victim in the previous car, and whether the victim's genes was found to have been discovered as direct damage to the victim in the previous car, and the defendant's assertion about the detection of crus in the defendant's name can be ruled out without any reasonable doubt, because the victim's genes was not detected, and the defendant's crus concurrents discovered with crus where crus were detected in the defendant's residence, and the crus was closed at the scene of the crime in this case, and there was a death close at the crus' lids at the scene of the crime in this case, and there was detection of crus in this case, and the defendant's assertion on the detection of crus, relief of victims, and request for rescue do not coincide with the objective situation.

The decision was determined.

B. The summary of the judgment of the court and the order of concrete judgment 1) The conviction in a criminal trial of relevant legal principles should be based on evidence with probative value sufficient to cause a judge to have a reasonable doubt that the facts charged are true, and if there is no evidence to form such a conviction, the defendant is suspected to be guilty.