logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.08.10 2017노864
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal in this case (violation of Acts and subordinate statutes) is that the defendant and the victim agreed before the judgment of the court below in this case and the victim expressed their intention not to want the punishment of the defendant, the judgment dismissing the public prosecution shall

Nevertheless, the court below is erroneous in sentencing one year of suspended sentence for six months of imprisonment without prison labor.

2. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaging in driving C car free cars.

On September 14, 2016, the Defendant entered the E side road located D at the time of resident stay at around 09:15, into the same Eup-Myeon (hereinafter referred to as the “E-Myeon”) at the same Eup-Myeon (hereinafter referred to as the “E-Myeon”).

The location is the three-lane national highways of which the vehicle is frequently accompanied at all times, and since the passage of the vehicle was more than ordinary, there was a duty of care to confirm the safety of the vehicle prior to the passage of the vehicle from the speed to the national highways of 3 times, and to check the safety by properly examining the direction prior to the passage of the vehicle into the national highways on the speed of 3 times.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 전ㆍ후방을 제대로 살피지 아니하고 가속 차로에서 3번 국도로 그대로 진입한 과실로, 상주시 쪽에서부터 문경시 방면으로 운행 중이 던 F 그랜저 승용차의 진로를 방해한 결과 피고인 운전의 카 렌스 승용차량 좌측 뒷 범퍼 부분으로 위 그랜저 승용차의 우측 앞 범퍼 부분을 충돌하고, 그 충격으로 피고인 운전의 카 렌스 승용차량이 앞으로 튕겨 져 나가 갓길에 정차 중이 던 G 아반 떼 승용차량의 좌측 뒷 휀 다 부분 등을 충돌하였다.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim H (Woo, 33 years of age) who was on board the said car with the foregoing occupational negligence, such as a pelle part of the pelle part of the pelle that requires approximately 14 weeks medical treatment.

3. Determination

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the above facts charged and sentenced the Defendant to a suspended sentence of one year in June of the imprisonment without prison labor.

arrow