Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won per day.

Punishment of the crime

On June 20, 2014, at around 00:30 on the first floor of the Suwon-si Building where the Defendant resides, on the ground that the Defendant’s upper house was sleep down at night, and the Defendant was sleeped with the wall of the building by pushing the front door door door door door door of an amounting to KRW 2.9,00 won at the market price. On the other hand, the Defendant was under investigation by the police officer belonging to the Suwon-gu Police Station C commander of the Suwon-gu Police Station, who was dispatched after approximately 10 minutes of the report, and was under investigation of the reasons, etc. for the damage of the property as above from D, and said, he was under investigation, and said, “I am to see whether I am about I am, I am about I am,” and “I am about I am about I am kne, I am kne, about knek kne 23 to kn kn kn's face.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged property and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each statement of E, F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (including photographs and estimates);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and the occupation of property damage and damage: Article 366 of the Criminal Act: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the obstruction of performance of official duties;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentence of a fine shall be imposed on the defendant in consideration of the fact that the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the provisional payment order is the primary offender, the fact that the defendant appears to have committed a contingency after drinking, and his depth is against it;