logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.01.12 2016가단229248
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiffs' primary claims are dismissed.

2. The defendant is respectively among the 70.4 square meters of the F-ro, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.

Reasons

The reason for the primary claim of the plaintiffs is attached Form 3A.

same as the entry in the subsection.

However, it is not sufficient to recognize the plaintiffs' assertion that the return agreement is constituted, and there is no other proof, only with the written evidence No. 3, A evidence No. 4, A evidence No. 5-1 and 2, etc.

Therefore, the primary claim is without merit.

In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in the evidence Nos. 1 and 5-2 of the preliminary claim Nos. 1 and 5-2, the separate statement Nos. 1, 2, and 3-B of the separate statement.

such facts as described in paragraph (1) may be recognized.

Thus, the defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration based on unjust enrichment return to the plaintiffs respectively.

It is so decided as per Disposition by accepting the conjunctive claim of the plaintiffs.

arrow