beta
Text
The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant B: Defendant B did not have made a statement that impairs the reputation of the victim F, and even though some spits are allowed to protruding the above F, there is no spits of spits or spits, and there is no fact that spits or spits do not contain bucks with the hand floor.
B. Defendant A: There has not been any assaulting the victim F’s face when he/she satisfys the chair and satisfy.
2. Determination
A. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to Defendant B’s assertion, the court below acknowledged the credibility in the statement of the witness F, E, and J of the court below. According to this, the defendant did not simply give passive answers to E, which is an apartment resident of the apartment on July 2010, but rather actively speaks that “the victim committed an indecent act against the victim’s sexual intercourse.” It is recognized that the defendant’s reputation was damaged by pointing out facts. The defendant’s injury was done on his hand at the bus stops located in the bus stops located in the area of Sungnam-gu apartment site in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, on April 24, 2012, putting the victim’s entrance into the area of the apartment at one time, spit the victim’s breath, and it was recognized that the victim’s brind with the victim on his hand, which constitutes an assault
B. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to Defendant A’s assertion, there is credibility in the statement of the witness F and J, etc. of the court below. According to this, around April 24, 2012, at around 20:20, the defendant left one chair at the council of occupants’ representatives of the above apartment complex to the floor and damaged the defendant by shouldering the above person’s plastic wheels. The victim was at around 20:40 on the same day when the defendant was placed at the bus stop in front of the above apartment complex in order to avoid the defendant at around 20:40 on the same day, and thus, the defendant’s assertion is without merit.
3. As such, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit and the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.