The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court’s sentence (two years of imprisonment) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Although the harmful effects of the singishing crime committed in a systematic and planned manner are serious and necessary to punish the participants, the defendant's participation in the collection of face-to-face liability is not less and less responsible, the number of crimes and the amount of damage is large, and the damage has not been recovered, as argued by the prosecutor, the defendant appears to have an attitude against the defendant when committing the crime, the defendant has no history of punishment in the Republic of Korea, the defendant has been forced to continue to commit the crime again even though he has retired after he/she committed the two-time crimes, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, and circumstances after the crime, are considered, it cannot be deemed unfair for the court below's punishment to be too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.