Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date of the conclusion of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 on May 12, 2015, at the time of the dispute with the victim B (the age of 33) living together in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu E apartment loan 402; (b) the date of the dispute with the victim’s face, and (c) the victim’s face with the hand-to-face, which is a thing dangerous in the kitchen, the kitchen (12cc in radius, 18cc in width) and the knife (19cc in length in length) and the knife (19cc in knife length), and (d) the victim’s head was panty.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous articles and inflicted injury on the victim, such as flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick.

2. The Defendant B, who was living together with the victim A (V, 26 years of age) at the same time and at the same place as that of paragraph (1), had the victim’s head flicked with the victim’s head and flicked the victim’s body and flicked the victim’s body and taken the victim a drinking time with the victim’s body, and the victim flicks (30cm in total length, 19cm in knife length) dangerous things in the kitchen, as in paragraph (1) and threatened the victim with a knife, knife the knife from the victim to take the knife and kill the victim.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous articles and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as faceing and liting the victim's face, in which the victim cannot know the days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure, the list of seizure, and the photograph of the suspect's body;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;

1. Defendant B: Defendant B asserted that the act of the Defendant constitutes excessive defense, but this case is the case.