logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.12.22 2014고단1489
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

It is necessary to revise and supplement the facts charged without going through amendments to Bill of Indictment to the extent that it seems that there is no substantial disadvantage to the defendant's defense right.

1. On July 31, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver’s License) and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, without a driver’s license, driven C rocketing car (hereinafter “the instant car”) in which the date of distribution in the Gu during the safe-time period of 0.146% of blood alcohol level 0.20% under the influence of alcohol level on July 31, 2014.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) and the Defendant were driving the instant vehicle at a temporary border such as those prior to the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and driving the instant vehicle at a six-lane road along the distance of Posing on the date director distance as at the Ansan-gu interest zone during the period of Ansan-gu.

The Defendant, as stated in the preceding paragraph, did not accurately operate the remaining operation system under the influence of alcohol as stated in the preceding paragraph, caused the victim f(s) f(s) driver f(s) who was parked in the traffic signal line in front of the instant passenger vehicle and damaged the victim f(s) who was traveling in the instant passenger vehicle with the victim D and f(s) and the victim G(s) with the victim f(s) who was traveling in the instant passenger vehicle with the driver f(s) in front of the instant passenger vehicle. At the same time, the Defendant damaged the f(s) f(s) and f) who was driving in the instant passenger vehicle with the victim f(s) and the victim f(s) with the victim f(s) who was driving in the instant passenger vehicle with the driver f

As a result, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, thereby causing the injury of a person due to the above occupational negligence, and damages the property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Statement 1. The circumstantial statement of an employee;

arrow