logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.02.08 2015누58111
취득세등부과처분취소
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

3. The total costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

Reasons

Judgment ex officio is made.

When an administrative disposition is revoked, such disposition shall lose its validity, and no longer exists, and a revocation lawsuit against a non-existent administrative disposition is unlawful as there is no benefit of lawsuit.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Du16879, Apr. 29, 2010). According to the purport of the entire pleadings, the Defendant may recognize the fact that the instant disposition was revoked ex officio during the proceeding of the instant lawsuit.

Therefore, the lawsuit of this case is seeking the revocation of a disposition which has not been extinguished and became unlawful as there is no benefit of lawsuit.

If so, the judgment of the first instance court is revoked and the lawsuit of this case is dismissed, and the total cost of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant in accordance with Article 32 of

arrow