The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is the representative of Company B, and Defendant B is a company engaged in principal and gold-type manufacturing business. A.

Defendant

A In spite of the fact that a person does not infringe upon author's property rights or other property rights protected under the law by means of reproduction, performance, public transmission, exhibition, distribution, lending, or secondary copyright preparation, he/she infringed on author's property rights by using the program 8.5 B program of the complainant C from June 1, 2017 to December 4, 2017 by using the program acquired 8.5 Bab from the complainant without good purchase.

B. Defendant B Co., Ltd. committed a violation as set forth in the above paragraph (a) with respect to his business.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Articles 136 (1) 1 and 141 of the Copyright Act;

(b) Offenses subject to prosecution: Article 140 of the Copyright Act.

C. Declaration of withdrawal of complaint: On November 15, 2018, after the indictment of this case, the complainant submitted to the court a letter of withdrawal of complaint to the Defendants on November 15, 2018.

Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act