Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

The application for compensation order of this case shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On May 20, 2015, the Defendant was able to receive interest at 2.5% per month from the perspective of lending stocks to the victim B and lending cash to the customer who needs to pay electricity in the middle-gu apartment located in Jung-gu, Gwangju, which is the Defendant’s residence.

It is believed that there is an opportunity to increase cash and investment.

If the problem is the problem, it will be responsible.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he will use the money borrowed from the victim's the victim's test for his personal debt and living expenses, and did not have the intention or ability to pay the victim the profits earned from the lending method to the investors of stocks.

On May 21, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from one financial investment account (C) under the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 159,425,00,00 in total by the same method until July 23, 2015, as in the list of crimes in attached Form 13 in the same manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. The details of remittances made to A by B and a detailed statement of transaction A;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of letters sent to A;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. 배상신청의 각하 소송 촉진 등에 관한 특례법 제 32조 제 1 항 제 3호, 제 25조 제 3 항 제 3호, 제 4호 양형의 이유 ① 피해 액이 크고 피해 회복이 이루어지지 않은 점, 피고인이 처음부터 개인적인 용도로 사용하기 위하여 피해자를 기망하였던 점, 귀농을 준비하면서 틈틈이 모아 둔 돈을 날려 버린 피해자의 손해가 적지 않아 보이는 점, 특히 친구인 피고인을 믿었다가 도리어 큰 피해를 보았던 피해자의 배신감이 적어 보이지 않는 점 등 피고인에게 불리한 정 상과, ② 피고인이...