logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.17 2017가합576398
특허등이전등록절차이행
Text

1. The defendant shall place the plaintiff with the patent right, design right, trademark right, and service mark right stated in the attached list.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is a company that engages in the business of issuing new clothing, manufacturing and selling clothing, etc., and the plaintiff is the representative director of the defendant.

B. The Plaintiff filed an application for a patent for the invention of the name B, B, and obtained a patent as D patent registration number E, as well as the registration in its name as to the patent 11, design right 4, trademark right 6, service mark 2, as shown in the attached list.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant industrial property rights” in total, including patents, design rights, trademark rights, and service marks listed in the separate list.

On January 7, 2014, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of all rights relating to the industrial property right of this case (hereinafter “registration of transfer of this case”) to the Defendant.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, each entry of Gap's 1 through 5 (including virtual number), and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The fact that the registration of transfer of this case was completed on January 7, 2014 with respect to the industrial property right of this case, registered under the name of the Plaintiff as to the cause of the claim, was completed on January 7, 2014, is as seen earlier, and the fact that the registration of transfer of this case was completed without any legal act that causes the Plaintiff

According to the above facts, the registration of transfer of this case shall be deemed to fall under the registration of invalidation of cause. Thus, the defendant is obligated to implement the registration of transfer on the industrial property right of this case to the plaintiff on the ground of the restoration

3. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow