A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 20, 2017, from around 20:30 to 21:25 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) dump and spoched fish fluent in the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si; (b) dump and dumped fish fluent in the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D; and (c) dump to fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent f

The same shall apply to bitbits, bits.

“Along with the intention of refusal to call a Handphone,” the surrounding people were able to take a brupt, and the attention was fluenced once again, and the other customers were taken in the restaurant by putting their cell phoness and putting them on a cell phone, and making it difficult to avoid disturbance for about 25 minutes, including continuous shooting, even though customers expressed their refusal to call a Handphone.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On October 20, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) around 21:35, at the place indicated in the preceding port; (b) at the F police box affiliated with the F police box called up after receiving 112 reports, he saw the left eyebrow in the process of arresting the Defendant in a flagrant act due to interference with his duties; (c) due to the suspension of the above G, the Defendant took one time the back of the said G due to the defect that he attempted to shot the Defendant’s eyebrow.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. A written statement prepared by I, J, and K;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning CCTV images-fashion photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the confession and reflect of the defendant, and the defendant agrees with the victim of the crime of interference with business smoothly to the extent that the victim wishes to be punished against the defendant;