1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 8, 2012, C, the representative of the Plaintiff, entered into a contract on the lease of the building Nos. 701 (hereinafter referred to as “instant office”) on land (hereinafter referred to as “instant contract”) owned by the Defendant from October 18, 2012, to October 18, 2013, with the term of lease from October 18, 2012 to October 18, 2013, with the name of the lessee as the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “instant contract”), and drafted a new contract with the lessee as the Plaintiff during the term of lease.

B. C, the representative of the Plaintiff, sent mobile phone text messages on August 30, 2013 and sent contents certification around September 25, 2013, notified the Defendant of the extension of the lease term on October 18, 2013, and requested the Defendant to return the lease deposit at the expiration of the term.

C. On October 18, 2013, the Plaintiff used the instant office as a place of business, and moved to a factory room after leaving a part of the office equipment. On March 5, 2014, the Plaintiff carried out all remaining goods without any use of equipment, such as chos, TV, etc.

On October 18, 2013, the Plaintiff was a director of the instant office, and did not inform the Defendant of the office entrance number, and notified the head of the building management office of the number around September 2014.

E. The Plaintiff did not pay the difference between September 2013 and October 10, 2013 among the rent up to October 18, 2013. The rate of delay damages for overdue rent as stipulated in the instant contract is 30% per annum.

F. On November 4, 2014, the Defendant found that the instant office was destroyed by entering the said tent, along with F, the Director of the Building Management Office.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2-2, Gap evidence 2-1, 2-2, Gap evidence 3 and 6-6, Eul evidence 6, Eul's witness F's testimony and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant contract was terminated on October 18, 2013, and the Plaintiff concluded the instant office with the Defendant.