logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.04.22 2015나2044821
동업청산금 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for adding the following judgments under Chapter 6, Chapter 20, the court's ruling of the first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the court's decision. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. As to the addition 4, at the time of the preparation of the instant agreement, the Plaintiff heard that “Seoul Central District Court Decision 2013Da505709 decided to repay the principal debt KRW 2 billion by withdrawing the case from the Defendant,” and made the instant agreement by clarifying that “the principal debt KRW 2 billion shall be repaid by the Defendant,” and that the Plaintiff shall withdraw the Plaintiff, which is limited to the above case. However, since the provision of an action against the Plaintiff was inserted in the instant agreement by deceiving and deceiving the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff shall be revoked on the ground of deception of the Defendant under the instant agreement, or the agreement was made up on the ground of the Defendant’s deception. At the time of the preparation of the instant agreement, the Plaintiff argued to the effect that the agreement under the instant agreement was revoked on the ground of the Defendant’s coercion. However, the evidence alone submitted by the Plaintiff was deceiving the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff's assertion is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff's father's father's father's son's son's son's son's F.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow