The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (4 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant is a primary offender, and is in profoundly against the mistake.

The degree of damage caused by the victim's injury requiring medical treatment for about 2 weeks is relatively weak.

The defendant agreed with the victim, and the vehicle of the defendant is covered by comprehensive insurance.

There is a situation that is not good for the defendant's health, such as suffering from a mental disorder of editing.

However, the crime of this case was committed in the front of the Defendant’s vehicle while the Defendant was taking the victim with a crosswalk as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the Defendant escaped after having the victim domination, and thus, the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak.

In full view of the statutory penalty of the instant case, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, etc. and all the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings, the sentence sentenced by the lower court cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is too appropriate and too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.