The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant asserts that: (a) there was no misrepresentation of the head of K agency office; (b) there was no promise to use the amount equivalent to the amount received from the victims as the surety insurance money; and (c) there was no criminal intent to obtain fraud since he failed to repay the loan from AF; (c) there was no deception of the above victim in connection with M development project; and (d) in the case of fraud against the victim E in the crime of paragraph (4) of the above crime of paragraph (6) of the above crime of this case, the Defendant did not borrow the money from E; and (5) in the case of fraud against the victim in paragraph (6) of the above crime of this case, there was no deception of the above crime of paragraph (10) of the above crime of this case, the Defendant did not borrow the money from the victim in relation to the guarantee insurance; and (4) in the case of fraud against the victim in W, he did not borrow the money from W to AO but did not have any intent to obtain the money from AO, and that he did not have any intent to obtain the money from AO.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (seven years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant, whether the Defendant misrepresented the K agency of I Chuncheon branch, was working at the J agency of I insurance Chuncheon branch, and thereafter excluded harassment from DE only on the document in question, and the above J agency was changed to K agency, and was working as an employee, such as attracting performance guarantee insurance, and the victims were not accused.

However, it is recognized by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the trial court.