logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2016.12.23 2016가단2901
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant) shall draw up a annexed map to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) among the 2,524 square meters of forest land C in Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s basic facts, on June 3, 2015, purchased 2524m2 from the Defendant for KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000 for the first intermediate payment on the date of the contract, and KRW 100,000,000,000 for the first intermediate payment, from the Defendant on the same year.

7.30. The second intermediate payment of KRW 100 million for the same year.

8. The remaining 30.30. and the remaining 50 million won were agreed to pay each of them on October 30 of the same year, and the Defendant agreed to have the Defendant’s grave located in the forest of this case (hereinafter “instant grave”) removed and removed within one year, and made the buyer’s early removal from the grave according to the Plaintiff’s circumstances.

(hereinafter “instant sales contract”). The Plaintiff’s sales proceeds amounting to KRW 50 million on June 3, 2015, and the same year.

7.31.10 million won, and the same year.

8.31.78 million won, per year;

9. 15.22 million won, and 50 million won, respectively, on December 18 of the same year.

On the other hand, the forest land before the instant division was owned by the Defendant at the time of the instant sales contract, and was owned by D, E, F, and G. The final decision of recommending reconciliation was finalized on July 14, 2015, with the purport that “2,524 square meters of the forest land before the instant partition shall be owned by the Defendant solely,” in the lawsuit claiming partition of co-owned property against D, E, F, and G (U.S. Military District Court Decision 2014Kadan14733) brought by the Defendant against D, E, F,

As above, while a decision to recommend reconciliation became final and conclusive and a considerable amount of the purchase price of this case was paid, the forest land before the instant subdivision was not divided and the Plaintiff was unable to complete the registration of ownership transfer, the Defendant from June 3, 2015 to the Plaintiff on August 30, 2015.

8. By December 1, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant prepared a loan certificate stating that a sum of KRW 250 million was received at least three times, and on December 1, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant sold KRW 2524 square meters of the forest land before the instant partition to the Plaintiff, and on December 1, 2015, the Defendant paid KRW 250 million out of which was paid at the time of the contract and paid KRW 50 million in the remainder until December 18, 2015. The instant grave was paid before Korea-style in December 2016.

arrow