1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is that the part which appears to be an obvious error or clerical error in the judgment of the court of first instance and its meaning is clearly clarified or the part which requires correction following a change in the court level is corrected or altered as follows. The defendant's judgment on the argument that the court particularly emphasizes as the ground for appeal is added to Paragraph 2. Thus, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (Provided, That the part on the claim for main claim that does not fall under the scope of the judgment of this court is excluded) is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Correctioned Parts

(a) Of the judgment of the first instance, the part “B” in the part “B (referring to the plaintiff)” in the part “B (referring to the plaintiff)” to “B (referring to the defendant)” in the 3rd 11st part of the judgment of the first instance

B. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part “not later than June 14, 2016” in the part “not later than June 14, 2017” with six (6) 5 and 15 (10) -

C. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part “60,270,117 won” in each of the “60,210,117 won” in each of the “60,210,117 won” in each of the “60,210,117 won” in each of the “60,270,117 won” in each of the “60,270,117 won” in each of the “60,270,117 won in each of the “60,270,117 won” in each of the “60,270,117

A. Of the judgment of the first instance, each “Seoul Western District Court” in part 7, 2, and 3 of each “Seoul Western District Court”

B. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part of the 7th following the 13th following the following: “A defendant violated the obligation to provide data on settlement,” and the part of the 7th following the 7th following the 7th instance judgment “it cannot be deemed that the defendant violated the obligation to provide data on settlement (Provided, That the Defendant cannot be deemed to have violated the obligation to provide data on settlement, unless it is acknowledged that the Defendant did not have paid

C. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the 15th 8 and 9 “including the foregoing obligation of settlement and the violation of the obligation of provision of settlement data.”