The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around July 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 22:50 on July 4, 2018, on the ground that the victim C (the age of 37) went on and out of the digging bridge in Dongjak-gu B market B market, and became a vision for the victim; and (b) threatened the victim with drinking, thereby threateninging the victim’s chest by hand, thereby running a chest 14-day care for approximately 14 days.

2. Defendant’s assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion is that: (a) from the investigative agency to the court of this Court, C was a time-to-bef in the passage of pedestrians, and (b) during that process, C was engaged in actions that seem to have been taken when drinking and drinking; (c) however, there was no actual fact that C was committing any injury or injury; (d) rather, the Defendant asserted that, in the process of using it with the front wheels of the Ortotob, where C was loaded on a water level, where C was loaded, there was a place of work in which two persons were brea, and C was able to take measures so that C did not go beyond the rear.

B. Major evidence as shown in the facts charged of the instant case includes C’s statement of damage, CCTV images at the site, injury diagnosis report, etc.

1) In relation to CCTVs, the Defendant and C have recorded the shape that they become the vision and the shape that they write the quibro, but the Defendant’s actions, such as smuggling’s chest, are not recognizable into the face. 2) At an investigation agency and this court, C stated that “A was able to take action when the Defendant intending to kill the Defendant while taking a bubbal bath, and she was able to do so, and she was able to do so, even though she was able to do so with the Defendant’s own chest and shoulder with the Defendant’s chest.”

C The above statements are clearly contrary to the testimony of the defendant and the defendant D and E, and the process and process of the vagabonds of the defendant and C appearing in CCTV images.