1. The defendant,

(a) Within seven (7) days from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the first part of the list of articles on the initial screen of the Defendant website (C).

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that concludes an entrusted management contract with the F Corporation and carries out the management services for the airport waterworks among the airport waterworks. The Defendant is a company that issues Internet newspapers G.

B. On November 21, 2017, the Defendant published an article (attached Form 2; hereinafter referred to as “instant article”) stating that the Defendant was de facto excluded from the full-time conversion due to the issuance of a letter of assignment by KC, which belongs to KC, working in the facilities of the I Airport, as the title “H” on the G website (C).

The article of this case was collected and drafted by Nonparty L.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to a request for a corrective report

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that “K” of the Plaintiff’s staff members who dealt with the instant article is M agency.

The article of this case was deprived of the opportunity that M is a full-time employee of the Plaintiff, and was deprived of the opportunity for M to be converted to a full-time employee in the F Corporation. ② The Plaintiff exchanged his opinion through several interviews with M as required for management, and then changed his workplace to a N Hospital, but was notified of the letter prior to the issuance day, and submitted M with mental impulses. ③ The Plaintiff was unable to find out a long-time employee and find out a person who was employed by M as a full-time employee, even though there was no fact that M was forced to work in an international public port where M was employed by employing a person in a relationship of relationship with management, and now, it was false to indicate the fact that the Plaintiff is likely to find out a new employee in the position to be converted to a full-time employee.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to make a corrective report in accordance with the Act on Press Arbitration and Remedies for Damage Caused by Press Reports.

B. The Defendant’s assertion ① According to the government policy, regular workers employed by the service company, such as the Plaintiff, are also subject to conversion into regular workers of the FF Corporation.

Therefore, as long as the plaintiff issued M to another workplace, it shall be given an opportunity to convert it to regular workers.