Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants’ previous convictions and occupational Defendant A are discharged from active service as a naval or noncommissioned officer.

Defendant

B is the director of the C branch of defoliants.

Criminal facts

1. Around November 2007, the background of the instant case and the public offering relation D (Detention) knew that F, which operates the Food Manufacturing and Sales Business Group (State) E, needs to be a site for factory relocation, demanded F to pay KRW 500,000,000,000 from December 15, 2007 to F to obtain the relevant authorization and permission and military consent, and that F, upon obtaining the relevant authorization and permission and military consent from G on February 15, 2008, was incorporated into a military installation protection area at the time of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, I, J, J and K, L, L, M, etc. (hereinafter “instant F site”), purchased KRW 14,380,00 square meters (hereinafter “this case’s F site”) from six parcels, such as the purchase price of KRW 6.5 billion, and introduced N to F on the same day as F, who can obtain military consent.

N (unconvictedd, Nos. 500 million won) was demanded to F to change F to F with consent and authorization within three months after the F was the death of her life and her life together with the Minister of National Defense.

N around February 16, 2008, at the (State)P office located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, prepared a false civil engineering work contract with F in the presence of D, and issued a cashier's check of KRW 100 million from F to October 22, 2008, under the pretext of obtaining the relevant authorization and permission and military consent, and received a total of KRW 395 million from F from that time until October 22, 2008, and then delivered KRW 56 million to D and KRW 50 million to Q.

N, upon receiving the F’s expense, proposed that part of the F’s expense should be provided by approaching the Defendants, and that the F’s factory site should be applied to the military unit having jurisdiction over the F’s factory site and obtained the consent of the authorizing and permitting-related military unit, and the Defendants also accepted it and conspired with N and D in sequence.

2. Defendant A: (a) around February 21, 2008, the trade name in the R of Kimpo-si cannot be known to Defendant A; (b) around major stations, N; and (c) the instant case.