logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.18 2018나33144
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs and the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the dismissal of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth in paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. The phrase “..” shall be added to the last part of the judgment of the first instance on the 3rd page 21.

Part 4 of the first instance judgment, "a confirmation and explanatory note" in the first instance judgment shall be deemed "a confirmation and explanatory note".

The first instance court's "the result of the first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's results of the first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's "the result of the first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's "the result of the second instance court's first

Part 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance ("the last part of the judgment of first instance") shall be "(")".

The defendant at the end of the 8th judgment of the first instance is moving "the defendant to "the plaintiff."

In the judgment of the court of first instance, "3. The scope of liability for damages" is as follows.

3. Where a real estate transaction party has entrusted a broker with the brokerage of real estate transactions, the broker is obligated to investigate and confirm the relationship of rights of the object of brokerage according to the purport of delegation, and if he/she breaches his/her duty of care, he/she shall be held liable for compensating for any loss incurred thereby. However, it cannot be deemed that the transaction party is wholly liable to investigate and confirm the relationship of rights of the object of brokerage to the broker and is out of its responsibility.

Therefore, where a broker fails to perform the necessary investigation and confirmation duty while mediating real estate transactions, the scope of compensation for damages incurred to the broker is determined, and the broker is also related to the transaction relationship.

arrow