A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for 16 years.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is transferred to the dynamics of the victim D ( South, 62 years old) and has any inconvenience in bridge due to the expenses of the baby.

On July 11, 2017, the Defendant added himself to the F prefabricated building manpower office adjacent to the F cafeteria-gun E in the Gandong-gun on July 15, 2017, and read himself as the “gorgian leg” and read as the “bridge.”

"I think that I would like to see their trade name, dispute, and kills the victim out of the office."

Accordingly, the Defendant, at a distance of about 40 meters from his own Gaburged car, carried a fishing knife (the "fast", the whole length of 24cc, the knife length of 15cc) which is a deadly weapon that he was in custody of the driver's seat next to the driver's seat, was put in the back knife, and carried in the F knife, while carrying the mixed alcoholic beverage into the F knife, she flife the Defendant's knife and flife the Defendant's knife while carrying the knife into the knife, and flife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif, and fnife knife knif.

Accordingly, the Defendant caused the victim to die from an I Hospital located in Gumi-si on July 11, 2017 to a low-blood shockor due to a chest multi-pactic shock on the part of Gumi-si on July 16:36, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement to J or K;

1. Each photograph;

1. A death diagnosis report and a victim D autopsy appraisal report;

1. Protocol of inspection;

1. Application of each protocol of seizure and each list of seizure to statutes;

1. Article 250 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 250 of the choice of punishment;

1. As to the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, the Defendant and his defense counsel had a mental and physical weakness under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime.

Therefore, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the defendant is deemed to have served alcohol at the time of the crime of this case, but the defendant's statement contents, the process of crime, and the crime.