logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.10.21 2015고단8
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Height 8]

1. On April 9, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim C told the victim C to the effect that “the biological family members in Busan-gun D will be able to repair the roof. First, as it is necessary to purchase materials, five million won would be deducted from the advance payment of repair expenses.”

However, even if the Defendant received money from the victim for the purchase of materials, it was intended to use it at another construction site, and it was difficult for the Defendant to take out financial conditions by performing construction works, such as fences, without any other self-sufficiency. Therefore, even if the Defendant received money from the victim, the victim’s life did not have the intent or ability to repair the roof.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 5 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant on the same day.

2. Around June 23, 2011, the Defendant: (a) at the construction site of a heat treatment plant located in Sacheon-si F; and (b) the victim E loaned equipment necessary for the Crain work, etc. of the printing team construction to the victim E at the end of the month.

However, at the time, the Defendant did not have any other financial ability and had an obligation of approximately KRW 70 million, and even if he received the construction cost from G, the original business entity, even if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the rent normally even if he used the equipment of the victim, such as the lack of financial capacity, in addition to appropriation for the payment of personnel expenses by the employees, even if he did not receive the construction cost from G, the original

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was provided with the same day by the victim, and was used by the victim until July 28, 201, but did not pay a total of KRW 25 million of the equipment rent, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the same amount.

[2015 order 583] The defendant called the victim J at the I's office operated by the defendant in J around September 14, 2014 and operated the 6 operation of the factory.

arrow