1. On April 18, 2014, the National Labor Relations Commission rendered relief for unfair dismissal between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor.

The Plaintiff is a corporation established on June 25, 1962 and engaged in credit business, mutual aid business, etc. using 45 full-time workers, and the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) who entered the Plaintiff on July 1, 2006 and was in charge of appraisal and assessment of real estate loans in the Seoul Metropolitan Area.

According to the evidence No. 7 (Special Audit Report) by the Intervenor on October 10, 2013, the Plaintiff’s dismissal against the Intervenor, following the resolution of the personnel committee, stated 25 cases as “a forged document” and “an appraisal price manipulation” as “a forged document” and “an appraisal price manipulation” as “an appraisal price manipulation,” while the Intervenor’s 51 case of real estate loan against the Seoul Metropolitan area real estate loan against the Intervenor was investigated into 26 cases in the Seoul Metropolitan area, the report items are written in 25 cases as “a forged document” and “an appraisal price manipulation.” The evidence No. 12-1 of the evidence No. 12, “24 cases” are written as the same number of cases. In light of the content of the investigation report by the special person.

Therefore, the number of loans at issue in the disposition of dismissal of this case is 51 cases.

In the course of appraising and appraising the following misconducts (hereinafter “instant disciplinary cause”), a disciplinary measure was taken to dismiss an intervenor pursuant to Articles 9 and 12 of the Membership Association Disciplinary Action Rules, on the ground that the intervenor committed the following misconducts (hereinafter “instant disciplinary cause”).

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant dismissal disposition”). The first inquiry tribunal of the Sinnam Regional Labor Relations Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “Disciplinary Reason 1”) asserts that the instant dismissal disposition is unfair, by asserting that the instant dismissal disposition is unfair, and that it is unfair, it is against the law of the Regional Labor Relations Commission around December 4, 2013.